| Summary, etc. |
<h4 style="font-size: 13px; margin: 0px 0.25em 0px 0px; text-transform: uppercase; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">OBJECTIVE:</span></h4><p style="margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; font-size: 1.04em; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">To examine the diagnostic accuracy of a previously developed model for prediction of preeclampsia (PE) by a combination of maternal factors and&nbsp;<span class="highlight">biomarkers</span>&nbsp;at 11-13 weeks' gestation.</span></p><h4 style="font-size: 13px; margin: 0px 0.25em 0px 0px; text-transform: uppercase; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">METHODS:</span></h4><p style="margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; font-size: 1.04em; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">This was a prospective first-trimester multicenter study of screening for PE in 8,775 singleton pregnancies. A previously published algorithm was used for the calculation of patient-specific risk of PE in each patient. The detection rates (DR) and false positive rates (FPR) for delivery with PE at &lt;32, &lt;37 and ≥37 weeks were estimated and compared to those in the dataset used for development of the algorithm.</span></p><h4 style="font-size: 13px; margin: 0px 0.25em 0px 0px; text-transform: uppercase; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">RESULTS:</span></h4><p style="margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; font-size: 1.04em; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">In the study population there were 239 (2.7%) cases that developed PE, including 17 (0.2%), 59 (0.7%) and 180 (2.0%) at &lt;32, &lt;37 and ≥37 weeks, respectively. In combined screening by maternal factors, mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index and serum placental growth factor the DR was 100% (95% CI 80-100) for PE at &lt;32 weeks, 75% (95% CI 62-85) for PE at &lt;37 weeks and 43% (95% CI 35-50) for PE at ≥37 weeks, at 10% FPR. These DRs were similar to the estimated rates in the dataset used for development of the model: 89% (95% CI 79-96) for PE at &lt;32 weeks, 75% (95% CI 70-80) for PE at &lt;37 weeks and 47% (95% CI 44-51) for PE at ≥37 weeks.</span></p><h4 style="font-size: 13px; margin: 0px 0.25em 0px 0px; text-transform: uppercase; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">CONCLUSION:</span></h4><p style="margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; font-size: 1.04em; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Combination of maternal factors and&nbsp;<span class="highlight">biomarkers</span>&nbsp;provides effective first-trimester screening for preterm-PE.</span></p> |