A comparison of meta-aggregation and meta-ethnography as qualitative review methods

By:

Lockwood, Craig

Contributor(s):

Pearson, Alan

Publication details: Philadelphia Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2013ISBN:

1469850974

Subject(s):

Online resources:

[E-book. Log-in using your OpenAthens account.]

Summary: Analyzing qualitative research can be done if the right methodology is utilized. Meta-ethnography is grounded in primary research traditions from the social sciences. It is an approach used to generate new theoretical knowledge related to sociological interests and generate new theoretical frameworks rather than aggregate knowledge. Meta-aggregation is a method of systematic review that mirrors the processes of a quantitative review while holding to the traditions and requirements of qualitative research. This book explores qualitative synthesis and the implications of particular approaches on the findings of qualitative reviews and compares and contrasts the methods used in qualitative research.

Holdings
Item type	Home library	Class number	Status	Date due	Barcode
Electronic book	Newcomb Library at Homerton Healthcare On website		Available

Analyzing qualitative research can be done if the right methodology is utilized. Meta-ethnography is grounded in primary research traditions from the social sciences. It is an approach used to generate new theoretical knowledge related to sociological interests and generate new theoretical frameworks rather than aggregate knowledge. Meta-aggregation is a method of systematic review that mirrors the processes of a quantitative review while holding to the traditions and requirements of qualitative research. This book explores qualitative synthesis and the implications of particular approaches on the findings of qualitative reviews and compares and contrasts the methods used in qualitative research.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.