000 | 02706cam a2200205 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NMDX7174 | ||
008 | 120401t2007 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 | _aDebnath, D | ||
240 | _aBMC Surgery | ||
245 | _aAneurysm of antecubital vein: an unusual complication of peripheral intravenous cannulation | ||
260 | _c2007 | ||
500 | _aNMUH Staff Publications | ||
500 | _a7 | ||
520 | _a<h4 style="font-size: 13px; margin: 0px 0.25em 0px 0px; text-transform: uppercase; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">BACKGROUND:</span></h4><p style="margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; font-size: 1.04em; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Intravenous cannulation is a very common procedure. Venous aneurysm secondary to peripheral intravenous cannulation is extremely rare. Moreover, venous aneurysm can mimic other conditions and may confuse the issue.</span></p><h4 style="font-size: 13px; margin: 0px 0.25em 0px 0px; text-transform: uppercase; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">CASE PRESENTATION:</span></h4><p style="margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; font-size: 1.04em; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">We describe a case of a 45-year-old woman who was referred with the diagnosis of varicose vein of right arm. A history of intravenous cannulation at the same site was noted that raised suspicion. The swelling was compressible and turned out to be a venous aneurysm. The lesion was completely excised. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Histology findings were in conformity with the preoperative diagnosis.</span></p><h4 style="font-size: 13px; margin: 0px 0.25em 0px 0px; text-transform: uppercase; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">CONCLUSION:</span></h4><p style="margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; font-size: 1.04em; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Caution should be exercised in diagnosing varicose vein at a site that bears a history of intravenous cannulation. The case also raises an important issue regarding consent. Should patients undergoing peripheral intravenous cannulation be warned of this rare complication?</span></p> | ||
700 | _aWallace, S. | ||
700 | _aMylona, E. | ||
700 | _aMyint, F. | ||
856 | _uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17570851 | ||
856 | _uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1906743/pdf/1471-2482-7-9.pdf | ||
999 |
_c76163 _d76163 |