000			08162cam a2200661 i 4500
001			on1020172557
003			OCoLC
005			20221128213413.0
006			m d
007			cr cnu---unuuu
008			180123s2018 nyua ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aN$T _beng _erda _epn _cN$T _dEBLCP _dKOS _dN$T _dYDX _dCASUM _dOCLCO _dOCLCF _dFQM _dOCLCO _dAU@ _dCUX _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCA _dOCLCQ _dK6U _dOCLCA _dVT2 _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO
019			_a1020867267 _a1294665128
020			_a9781604068825 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_a1604068825 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_z9781604068818
020			_z1604068817
035			_a1691803 _b(N$T)
035			_a(OCoLC)1020172557 _z(OCoLC)1020867267 _z(OCoLC)1294665128
060		4	_aWE 725
072		7	_aMED _x085000 _2bisacsh
049			_aMAIN
130	0		_aControversies in spine surgery (Vaccaro)
245	1	0	_aControversies in spine surgery, MIS versus open : _bbest evidence recommendations _c _h[E-Book]
250			_aSecond edition
264		1	_aNew York : _bThieme, _c[2018]
300			_a1 online resource : _billustrations
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file
347			_bPDF
347			_bhtml
490	1		_aThieme clinical collection
588	0		_aPrint version record
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index
500			_aPreceded by Controversies in spine surgery / [edited by] Alexander R. Vaccaro, Jason C. Eck. �2010
505	0		_aLumbar discectomy : Are tubular or endoscopic discectomies better than traditional microdiscectomy? / MIS: Martin H. Pham, Alexander Tuchman, John C. Liu, open: John D. Attenello, Steven R. Garfin, Richard Todd J. Allen -- Lumbar stenosis best treated with an open laminectomy? / MIS: Hasan R. Syed and Sylvain Palmer -- Facet cysts : Is there an advantage to treating synovial cysts with MIS techniques? / MIS: Jose M. Torres-Campa, Marjan Alimi, and Roger Hartl -- Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion : MIS vs open / MIS: Rory J. Petteys, Anthony Conte, and Faheem A Sandhu, open: Jason C. Eck -- The lateral transpsoas approach versus ALIF : Do the risks of lateral interbody fusion outweigh the benefits compared to anterior lumbar interbody fusion? / MIS: Steven M. Spitz, Hasan R. Syed, and Jean-Marc Voyadzis, open: David L. Scott, and Peter G. Whang -- Is AxiaLIF comparable to open Fusion with ALIF and posterolateral 360-degree fusion at L5-S1? / MIS: Venu M. Nemani and Oheneba Boachie-Adjei, open: John D. Koerner, and Todd J. Albert -- Multiple-level interbody fusion : How do two-level fusion techniques compare between open and MIS? / MIS: OluMide Ojeifo, Christopher Hills, and Robert E. Isaacs, open: P. Justin Tortolani -- Is lumbar adjacent segment degeneration best treated using MIS over open fusion techniques? / MIS: Luiz Pimenta, Luis Marchi, Leonardo Oliveira, open: Christopher M. Bono -- Degenerative scoliosis : Is there an advantage to using MIS techniques to treat degenerative scoliosis? / Chun-Po Yen, Juan S. Uribe, Christopher I. Shaffrey -- Flatback syndrome : Can lumbar flatback syndrome be treated adequately with MIS techniques? / MIS: Navid R. Arandi and Gregory M. Mundis Jr., open: Randa El Mallah and Ahmad Nassr -- Can thoracic disc herniation be effectively treated using MIS techniques? / MIS: Paul W. Millhouse, Troy Mounts, Kristen E. Radcliff, open: Alexander A. Theologis, Vedat Deviren -- Posterior cervical foraminotomy / MIS: Tim Eugene Adamson, open: Andrew Hecht and Steven Joseph McAnany -- Complications of instrumentation : Is there a higher complication rate in placing instrumentation via an MIS technique compared with an open technique? / MIS: Russell G. Strom, and Anthony K. Frempong-Boadu, open: Saad B. Chaudhary and Michael J. Vives -- Dural tears : Should an MIS complication such as a dural tear routinely be opened for adequate repair or are there safe and reliable MIS techniques for dural closure? / MIS: John E. O'Toole, open: Michelle J. Clarke -- Do MIS techniques broaden the scope for geriatric spine surgery? / Michael Y. Wang -- Thoracolumbar burst fractures : Can thoracolumbar burst fractures be effectively managed using minimally invasive surgery techniques? / MIS: Gurpreet S. Gandhoke, David O. Okonkwo, and Adam S. Kanter, open: Amandeep Bhalla and Kristen E. Radcliff -- Open and minimally invasive treatment of cervical spine fractures / MIS: Michael Y. Wang and Joanna Gernsback, open: S. Babak Kalantar and Joseph Paul Letzelter III -- Thoracolumbar metastatic tumors : comparison of minimally invasive surgery versus open techniques for addressing thoracolumbar metastatic tumor resection and stabilization / MIS: Dr. Prashanth J. Rao and Dr. Ralph J. Mobbs, open: Dr. Peter S. Rose and Dr. Michelle Clarke -- Intradural spine tumors : Is There an advantage to removing intradural spine tumors using an MIS approach? / MIS: Anthony Conte, and Trent L. Tredway, open: Jeremy Fogelson and Michelle J. Clarke -- Quality of life in advanced tumors : Can minimally invasive surgery techniques improve the quality of life of patients with advanced oncologic disease to allow for decreased pain or should traditional techniques of palliation be used? / MIS: Ankit I. Mehta, open: Alp Yurter and Daniel M. Sciubba -- Radiation exposure : How does radiation exposure differ between open and minimally invasive techniques? / MIS: Jonathan Yun and Alfred T. Ogden, open: Mark L. Prasarn -- Infection rates : How do infection rates compare between MIS and open spine techniques? / MIS: Kurt M. Eichholz, open: Bryce A. Basques, Daniel D. Bohl, Nicholas S. Golinvaux, and Jonathan N. Grauer -- Cost : Which cost more, open or MIS surgery? / MIS: Scott L. Parker, open: Matthew J. McGirt -- Success rates and Time : Can three-dimensional navigational imaging improve the success and time required for MIS surgery and minimize radiation exposure to those in the OR Suite? / Eric W. Nottmeier
520			_aMIS and open approaches are thoroughly compared and contrasted in each chapter. Evidence is presented and analyzed in an objective manner with 'opposing sides' presenting differing opinions and techniques, resulting in a synchronous collection of pros and cons. Every chapter is masterfully summed up by the book's editors -- each of whom have varying stances on the topics at hand. This unique 'duel' and 'duet' discussion enables readers to assimilate information, benefit from the balanced harmony between divergent opinions, and reach their own conclusions. Key Highlights: Comparative risks, benefits, complications, and outcomes for a full spectrum of lumbar, thoracic and cervical procedures; MIS versus open approaches for lumbar stenosis, synovial cysts, lumbar adjacent segment degeneration, degenerative scoliosis, flatback syndrome, thoracic disc herniation, and dural tears; Tumor resection and stabilization, quality of life issues, and potential advantages and risks of MIS techniques; Key differences in MIS versus open operations such as radiation exposure and costs; Analysis of 3-D navigational imaging to improve outcomes and reduce radiation exposure and operating time. -- Publisher
590			_aWorldCat record variable field(s) change: 650
650		0	_aSpine _xSurgery.
650		0	_aSpine _xEndoscopic surgery.
650		0	_aEvidence-based medicine.
650		0	_aOrthopedic surgery.
650	1	2	_aSpine _xsurgery
650	2	2	_aMinimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
650	2	2	_aOrthopedic Procedures
650	2	2	_aSpinal Fractures _xsurgery
650	2	2	_aSpinal Neoplasms _xsurgery
700	1		_aVaccaro, Alexander R., _eeditor.
830		0	_aThieme clinical collection.
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?custid=ns123844&authtype=ip,shib&direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1691803 _yKingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust OpenAthens account holders click here for access
938			_aProQuest Ebook Central _bEBLB _nEBL5233372
938			_aEBSCOhost _bEBSC _n1691803
938			_aYBP Library Services _bYANK _n15110743
942			_n0
994			_a92 _bN$T
999			_c92982 _d92982